Decoding Process’s

Over the time of the blog i’ve continually improved the decoding process’s for the various matrix systems that were used by record company’s to encode four channels onto a stereo LP.

I’m now at a point where i feel that there is very little improvement that can be made using the tools we have at hand at this time, so many of the process’s are being upgraded to include my recent work on solving the individual issues of each system that were not possible to deal with, or talked about, in the 1970’s and will be the end to my research and development of such process’s.

To distinguish these from all previous process’s they are named after ‘mythical’ creatures:

DY: ‘Unicorn’

EV-4: ‘Centaur’

QS: ‘Sphinx’

SQ: ‘Phoenix’

Matrix H: ‘Hydra’

Matrix HJ: TBA

The following process’s remain the same:

Dolby Surround: DS/IV

45J: Ambi-45J

UHJ: Ambi-UHJ

Super-Stereo: Ambi-SS

 

3 Responses to “Decoding Process’s”

  1. beukenoot October 26, 2014 at 22:19 #

    AP – Stereotomy was it in this Ambisonic decoded?

  2. gjwAudio September 2, 2014 at 01:49 #

    Hi OD

    Regarding Amb-SS, can you elaborate on how you use the process to create material for DSQB-II. I imagine it is the tool used to create B-format files from “regular” 2-channel, which are then sent through a subsequent decode-to-quad step.

    Are there parameters to adjust in SS, that will modify the results coming out of the quad-decode ? Do you run a test pass, evaluate, and perhaps go back to the SS stage to “twiddle the knobs” ?

    I’m curious because I have a little project in mind that may benefit from these Ambisonic treatments. Any insight would be much appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Grant

    • oxforddickie September 2, 2014 at 01:59 #

      You are correct in that it is a process that converts a standard two channel source to a quasi B-format format that is then converted into a standard four channel format.

      The two channel to B-Format process is actually pre-set. Once i’d formulated the mathematical process i decided to leave it alone. It would be possible to add controls to vary the width etc, but so far the mathematical equation used seems perfect without any further alteration. Sometimes, basic is best!

      Hope that answers your question.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: