Walter/Wendy Carlos – Switched-On Bach

23 Jun

waltercarlos-switchedonbachfront

Quite possibly the ultimate SQ demonstration album. I think even Walter/Wendy would have been more than happy if SQ could have been decoded to this level back in the day.

Allmusic

Release: DS123p

Source: SQ LP

Process: ‘Phoenix’

Format: DVD-A/V  MLP/DTS/DD

Advertisements

35 Responses to “Walter/Wendy Carlos – Switched-On Bach”

  1. jessicafaith84 June 15, 2018 at 16:47 #

    I realize you are no longer sharing for the most part…. but…. I had this at one time…. lost it in a computer crash. I’d really, really like to have it again. I’d be eternally grateful to you if you would be willing to let me have it again.

    Thanks!

    Sincerely,
    Jessica.

    • oxforddickie June 15, 2018 at 17:54 #

      I’m sorry but the blog is closed for any titles apart from the small number of ‘The Reference’ series that i’m putting out before closing for good. Add to that i’ve yet to do a SQd decode of it so i have nothing to listen to, or share, anyway.

      • jessicafaith84 June 18, 2018 at 20:22 #

        You’re a real piece of shit, you know that?

        • oxforddickie June 18, 2018 at 20:45 #

          And people wonder why i want out of the world of quadrophonie. You, and others like you, have my complete and utter disdain.

          • jessicafaith84 June 19, 2018 at 23:16 #

            And to think…. I’d have paid you quite nicely for a copy of this.

          • Owen Smith June 20, 2018 at 01:01 #

            And there was a time Richard would willingly have taken your donation, or accepted evidence that you had donated for it in the past if either of you could find such. Personally I regret that such times are over but things have happened that can’t or won’t be undone. Richard has mentioned many times on here his health issues, and while they’re not the entire story they are certainly a changing backdrop.

          • SacdtoDvda June 24, 2018 at 06:32 #

            Wow.

            Dale Carnegie, eat your heart out!

        • Owen Smith June 18, 2018 at 21:02 #

          This is Oxford Dickie’s blog and he provided the conversions in the past. It is entirely up to him who he does or does not provide them to and when. He has no obligation to anyone on this matter. And as he says, it is people with attitudes like yours who made him stop in the first place.

          I am grateful for what we had and the work that Oxford Dickie put into it, and I am also sad that it is over. But it is his blog and his work, he can do what he likes with it.

          • oxforddickie June 18, 2018 at 21:45 #

            Thank you Owen, much appreciated

            • jessicafaith84 June 19, 2018 at 23:50 #

              I found a lot nicer transfer anyway. True discrete, not matrix. Here’s a download link, as I’m not a stingy fuck like some people

              Link removed due to questionable source/virus issues

              • oxforddickie June 20, 2018 at 00:11 #

                Enough’s enough, she is now banned

              • Owen Smith June 20, 2018 at 01:04 #

                Wendy Carlos’s own web site says the album was only ever put out in matrix format, much to Wendy’s everlasting annoyance. So I’m not convinced any discrete sourced version exists and would be equally concerned. If Wendy had a discrete version I think she’d have done something with it by now.

                • oxforddickie June 20, 2018 at 07:34 #

                  Again thank you Owen

                  I’m so damn tired of the attitude of people in the quadraphonic arena, i’m involved in a couple of other (non-quad) areas and there’s nothing like this happening in any of them.

                  It makes me want to just press the delete button….

                • Owen Smith June 20, 2018 at 09:51 #

                  Indeed, this sort of attitude is why I’ve reduced my exposure to the quad scene and only frequent this and the captain’s blogs. As soon as I pop up anywhere else in the quad scene (not just on QQ) it becomes more hassle than it is worth. I don’t frequent the web to be insulted, I have better things to do with my time.

                  And equally, I’m involved in a couple of other things online, and nothing like this happens there either or if it does it is rarely and with much better reason and expressed more intelligently.

                • jessicafaith84 June 21, 2018 at 21:48 #

                  I apologize for being so nasty earlier.

                  I don’t wish to argue, and am only engaging because you responded.

                  THE REST HAS BEEN REMOVED!!!!!!

                  • oxforddickie June 22, 2018 at 08:47 #

                    Right

                    I’ve only allowed this comment after removing 60% of it. It was something i would expect to read in QQ, consisting of comments that are one sided and biased without any technical knowledge behind them.

                    I don’t mind comments IF THEY ARE UNBIASED and are the result of proper comparison’s, but they read as being very one-sided and to cause arguments, so was edited.

                    Thankfully, until now, i’ve not had to be so hard with people but if this is the start of something, it ends here.

                    Your a smidgen from being permanently banned.

                    • jessicafaith84 June 22, 2018 at 22:56 #

                      I assure you, it was not intended to be the start of anything. Rather, an attempt to explain myself and my position civilly.Please don’t ban me. I will now drop the subject.

    • oxforddickie June 22, 2018 at 11:38 #

      I’ve been musing over this for a while and there’s a problem here. In all the years i’ve been running the blog i cannot bring to mind ever having had a female join the ranks.

      So, if you lost THIS album in a hard drive crash, where did you get it from and if it was one of the small number of versions of this particular album, which version did you have?

      Or were you just hoping to try and get something for nothing? Or, as i’m now suspecting, are you just a bloody trouble maker?

      • Owen Smith June 22, 2018 at 15:31 #

        Never mind on this blog, the only woman I’ve encountered in the entire quad community is Quad Linda.

      • jessicafaith84 June 22, 2018 at 23:04 #

        I honestly don’t recall where I got it from, but it was a vinyl transfer and I was quite certain it was your transfer at the time I made my initial post. Now, I don’t know .I am a serious collector of music.I certainly was not trying to get something for nothing, but I can hardly blame you for thinking that, what with how I behaved the other day and all. I will tell you, that had you still had this to share with me, I’d have been willing to pay virtually anything you asked. I never wanted to be a troublemaker but I do have issues. I was having a very bad day the other day, but I will spare you the details. I am sorry I took my frustration out on you, and I hope you will forgive me.

  2. atq August 6, 2015 at 15:04 #

    This is the only quad version I’ve heard, so cannot compare, but it sounds great to me. Lots of discrete stuff going on, and some lovely rumbling bass notes. Interesting to read Wendy’s concerns re Quad on her webpage.

  3. Owen Smith June 29, 2015 at 15:34 #

    I’m completely blown away, this takes SQ decoding to another level and is a tour de force for Phoenix. We are privileged to hear this, as it was meant to sound for the first time since the quad master tapes. I am convinced Walter/Wendy would be more than happy with this.

    I suspect this was encoded with an original four position SQ encoder, I’m not hearing a great deal of between speaker positions except for a very convincing phantom centre in some tracks. As others have said, we’re meant to hear the individual speakers with this.

    Unlike others I do hear vinyl issues. There is surface noise in places and certainly between tracks until OD fades it down. I’m also wondering if there is master tape noise, some tracks have some background noise and others at the same volume don’t which makes vinyl surface noise seem unlikely (unless it’s an inner track at that point).

    Musically it is as others have said a very good selection of Bach, with some very bold choices of synth sounds in places. One thing that doesn’t work for me is one track that changes volume a lot, it all happens so perfectly in sync it is obviously someone turning a master volume knob up and down.

    So how about a DS/IIII decode of Switched On Bach 2000 to go with this gem?

    • oxforddickie June 29, 2015 at 16:33 #

      This was done with the original encoder, as were all of the ‘Gold Band’ releases.

      Your correct there is a minor amount of LP noise and tape hiss. I tried my best to hide as much as i could (no noise reduction, etc was used on the music itself)

      Dear old ‘Dulby Surround’, maybe, but Matrix H & HJ are the next to do/upgrade to their improved versions.

    • Owen Smith June 29, 2015 at 19:57 #

      I thought DS/IIII ideas fed into Phoenix and therefore DS/IIII is as up to date as the mythical processes. They were devloped within a couple of weeks of each other.

      • oxforddickie June 29, 2015 at 20:05 #

        Phoenix came out of the ashes of the aborted SQ/IV and is a modified version of SQ/III, which was never used.

        The principles behind the Dolby Surround process are somewhat different and because of the changes/omissions Dolby made when the stole SQ the two are different and incompatible, especially when it comes to expanding the decoding process.

        Although they may have been developed a few weeks apart they, to me that’s a life-time. I concentrate on one process at a time and once one is completed i clear the head of everything and when ready start afresh.

      • Owen Smith June 29, 2015 at 20:12 #

        Actually you did four SQ/III releases on the blog but all have since been re-released in Phoenix. I still have some of the SQ/III discs for comparison purposes, eg. Maurice Andre and Jane Parker Smith.

  4. joeerand June 28, 2015 at 18:22 #

    This is a spectacular decode. The low end is sparse on some of the arrangements in the source material, but when it’s there (like on track 1) it sounds fantastic. Your vinyl transfer sounds as good as a tape transfer…I hear no vinyl artifacts. And as the others have said, the imaging so precise you feel you can see it. (Yes, perhaps helped by the fact there is so little ambience used in the final mix, although it is on the individual tracks.)
    Your decode elevates this record to a new level. You can’t help but be impressed that this was recorded one track/one note at a time, but it’s so musical. The choice of timbres is really creative, and the whole album is a well-selected suite of Bach’s music that is very satisfying to listen through. How sad this is the only one in SQ, but it is the best of Carlos’ releases. (I would’ve loved to hear “Sonic Seasonings” in quad also.)

  5. crispin14 June 27, 2015 at 22:52 #

    Excellent decode. This is probably as close as one can get to 4 separate sound sources. Less precise decodes had enough errors to seem to fill the spaces between speakers; this decode definitely has less imagery in centre front and centre sides. What Walter was trying to do I believe is to extract the detail from Bach’s writing using two tools, sound shaping and separation.
    The purity the electronic timbres is not diluted by any room or hall ambience. With most surround sound, the speakers disappear, but that was not Carlos’ intention here: we hear the outputs of the instrument directly.

  6. bigheadrascal June 26, 2015 at 07:57 #

    The previous two SQ decodes were certainly impressive in their time. This newest decode brings Switched On Bach to a level that I’d be willing to bet meet Wendy/Walter’s expectations and approval. I heard things in this one that until now had remained obscured.

    • oxforddickie June 26, 2015 at 08:46 #

      I agree, the stability and solidity of the sounds brings it so close to the original four channel master, but also it allows the effects used on each sound to be better heard. For me it’s another decode that shows that although there may be some information lost during encoding, a lot of the problems people hear is actually down to decoder design….. but that’s a tough subject and needs to be discussed elsewhere.

      I’m glad you enjoyed it, i’ve played it at least a couple of times a day since decoding it, such a shame his dislike of SQ meant that none of his other albums weren’t released in quad, it’s the perfect medium for it.

  7. joeerand June 25, 2015 at 16:42 #

    Can’t wait to hear your new decode. I wonder if people realize what a huge cultural impact this album made when it was released and became a bestseller. News magazines did articles about it, and you’d hear it playing in public spaces. As a very young musician, it stoked my imagination that there was a new mysterious box, the Moog, that reportedly could create any sound the human ear could imagine! (Ears can’t imagine, but you know what I mean…)

    • oxforddickie June 25, 2015 at 17:32 #

      I know my views on this new decode but it would be nice to hear others views and/or comparisons

  8. mickjerome June 23, 2015 at 16:58 #

    Thanks,this one is crystal clear!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: