Rufus – Rags To Rufus

15 Aug

Rufus - Rags to Rufus DS410f front

Album info

Release: DS410f

Source: QS LP

Process: QS/IIa



12 Responses to “Rufus – Rags To Rufus”

  1. atq January 12, 2017 at 19:29 #

    Great sound quality. Lots of stuff happening in all 4 corners. In general, it all sounds very discrete, but a few times it’s difficult to place certain instruments – they bleed from FR to SR or FL to SL. However, at other times all 4 speakers have sounds clearly locked in place, so the decode can obviously produce (near) discrete results. I therefore suspect that it’s the mix that accounts for the occasional blurriness. I noticed it on piano and horns, so they were probably recorded in stereo and spread from front to back anyway, but not very successfully. I’m only mentioning this in an attempt to give detailed feedback on decoding quality. Basically, this is great sound quality, great mix, great decode. Thanks yet again! (Also, yet another title that I would never have listened to except for it being in quad.)

  2. Owen Smith August 31, 2014 at 11:13 #

    I agree with other comments, this is a great record and a great quad mix. The QS/IIa decode is fantastic, separation is amazing without seeming artifical or forced. A great job all round, both from the original mixers on the record and OD for the decode.

  3. jaypfunk August 18, 2014 at 19:53 #

    This is a really record and the QUAD is totally awesome. Thanks O.D.

  4. birdycat19 August 17, 2014 at 04:20 #

    Just wonderful! Always my favorite Rufus album…

  5. quadsome August 16, 2014 at 16:31 #

    Folks, you need look no further than THIS release to fully appreciate the QS decode work of OD! Absolutely amazing to hear thIS level of 4 channel discrete sound from a QS album. The music on this album would be awesome in MONO…now to hear it this way, all we can say is THANK YOU!

    • jaypfunk August 19, 2014 at 14:07 #

      I agree 100%. This one is fantastic. Amazing separation.

      • oxforddickie August 19, 2014 at 15:21 #

        Thanks for all the remarks regarding the separation. Of course the decode can only be as good as the mix, and for once (for a QS title) someone actually produced quality mix. Shame there isn’t more like this.

  6. donhochiminh August 16, 2014 at 14:11 #

    Thank you. Sounds amazing!

  7. joeerand August 16, 2014 at 10:51 #

    Thank you, OD!

  8. bigheadrascal August 16, 2014 at 03:44 #

    Brings back memories. I can’t decide which is better, QS or SQ. Neither sounded this good back in the day. An excellent decode and also an excellent mix. I’ll wear this one out with much gratitude.

  9. birdycat19 August 15, 2014 at 18:23 #

    Day-yam! Another of my “Holy Grail” titles! Can’t wait to finally hear this one…you’re on a roll!

  10. jaypfunk August 15, 2014 at 16:20 #

    Nice one. Been hoping this one would show up. Thanks OD

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: